10-12-2009, 05:14 PM
Shlama Khulkon:
I think I've found the reason for another "possible" error in the Khabouris Codex. In Matthew 1:6 there is a proclitic VAV added to
Jesse begat David the king, and David begat Solomon of the wife of Uriah
???????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????? ???? ?????????? ????????????
The VAV could just be a period at the end of the previous line as in the Mingana Peshitta, which may have been large enough to have been mistaken for a VAV. It's a possibility.
Shlama,
Stephen Silver
Dukhrana Biblical Research
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com">http://www.dukhrana.com</a><!-- m -->
I think I've found the reason for another "possible" error in the Khabouris Codex. In Matthew 1:6 there is a proclitic VAV added to
Jesse begat David the king, and David begat Solomon of the wife of Uriah
???????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????? ???? ?????????? ????????????
The VAV could just be a period at the end of the previous line as in the Mingana Peshitta, which may have been large enough to have been mistaken for a VAV. It's a possibility.
Shlama,
Stephen Silver
Dukhrana Biblical Research
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com">http://www.dukhrana.com</a><!-- m -->