Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Romans 1:26 revisited
#5
January 25, 2005

It seems highly unlikely the tha Apostle Paul was thinking about venereal disease or any perversion-related diseases when he wrote Romans 1:26 since there was no concept of such things in the first Century and it would have been without meaning to his listeners even if he was miraculously inspired. However, sexual passion has always been well understood and vile passions describes perversion well.

Otto
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Romans 1:26 revisited - by Larry Kelsey - 01-24-2005, 05:38 AM
[No subject] - by gbausc - 01-24-2005, 06:01 PM
[No subject] - by Keith - 01-24-2005, 10:23 PM
[No subject] - by Dan Gan - 01-25-2005, 03:34 AM
[No subject] - by ograabe - 01-25-2005, 07:06 PM
[No subject] - by Dan Gan - 01-25-2005, 07:50 PM
[No subject] - by gbausc - 01-26-2005, 08:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)