How do you think 2 Peter 3:10 originally read?
Book of Second Peter
3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in which the heavens will
pass away with a great noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fervent
heat, and the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. 3:11 Therefore
since all these things will be destroyed like this, what kind of people ought you to
be in holy living and godliness, 3:12 looking for and earnestly desiring the
coming of the day of God, which will cause the burning heavens to be dissolved,
and the elements will melt with fervent heat? 3:13 But, according to his promise,
we look for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.
2 Peter 3:10
http://web.ovc.edu/terry/tc/lay272pt.htm
TEXT: "the works that are in it will be found [out]."
EVIDENCE: S B K P 1175 1241 1739text 1881 syr(ph)
TRANSLATIONS: ASVn NASVn NIV NEB TEVn
RANK: D
NOTES: "the works that are in it will be burned up."
EVIDENCE: A 048 33 81 104 614 630 945 1739margin 2495 Byz Lect some lat later vg syr(h) cop(north)
TRANSLATIONS: KJV ASV RSV NASV NIVn NEBn TEVn
NOTES: "the works that are in it will be found dissolved."
EVIDENCE: p72
TRANSLATIONS: TEVn
NOTES: "the works that are in it will disappear."
EVIDENCE: C
TRANSLATIONS: TEV
OTHER: "the works that are in it will not be found."
EVIDENCE: cop(south)
OTHER: omit from "and the earth" to the end of the verse
EVIDENCE: Psi two lat earlier vg
Text Note: 2 Peter 3:10
http://www.jeffriddle.net/2014/09/text-n...r-310.html
IV. Conclusion:
The traditional text rendering has ancient support. It was the reading eventually adopted by the majority. Even though the NA27 reading is supported by the twin heavyweight of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Metzger gives it only a “D” rating and despairs that none of the existing readings “seems to be original” (p. 705).
The NA 28 editors simply followed Metzger’s trajectory by offering a conjecturally emended reading which inserts the negative particle _ouch_, even though it is found in no extant Greek manuscripts and only weakly attested in the versional witnesses.
This variant demonstrates that the modern critical text editors are willing to make conjectural emendations to supply what they believe to be the best readings.
Does it Burn, or is it Exposed? (2 Peter 3:10)
https://www.petergoeman.com/burn-exposed-2-peter-310/
In this case, although κατακαήσεται (“It will be burned up”) has the most Greek manuscripts on its side, εὑρεθήσεται (“It will be found/revealed”) is actually supported by the Greek manuscripts that are dated earlier....
Book of Second Peter
3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in which the heavens will
pass away with a great noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fervent
heat, and the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. 3:11 Therefore
since all these things will be destroyed like this, what kind of people ought you to
be in holy living and godliness, 3:12 looking for and earnestly desiring the
coming of the day of God, which will cause the burning heavens to be dissolved,
and the elements will melt with fervent heat? 3:13 But, according to his promise,
we look for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.
2 Peter 3:10
http://web.ovc.edu/terry/tc/lay272pt.htm
TEXT: "the works that are in it will be found [out]."
EVIDENCE: S B K P 1175 1241 1739text 1881 syr(ph)
TRANSLATIONS: ASVn NASVn NIV NEB TEVn
RANK: D
NOTES: "the works that are in it will be burned up."
EVIDENCE: A 048 33 81 104 614 630 945 1739margin 2495 Byz Lect some lat later vg syr(h) cop(north)
TRANSLATIONS: KJV ASV RSV NASV NIVn NEBn TEVn
NOTES: "the works that are in it will be found dissolved."
EVIDENCE: p72
TRANSLATIONS: TEVn
NOTES: "the works that are in it will disappear."
EVIDENCE: C
TRANSLATIONS: TEV
OTHER: "the works that are in it will not be found."
EVIDENCE: cop(south)
OTHER: omit from "and the earth" to the end of the verse
EVIDENCE: Psi two lat earlier vg
Text Note: 2 Peter 3:10
http://www.jeffriddle.net/2014/09/text-n...r-310.html
IV. Conclusion:
The traditional text rendering has ancient support. It was the reading eventually adopted by the majority. Even though the NA27 reading is supported by the twin heavyweight of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Metzger gives it only a “D” rating and despairs that none of the existing readings “seems to be original” (p. 705).
The NA 28 editors simply followed Metzger’s trajectory by offering a conjecturally emended reading which inserts the negative particle _ouch_, even though it is found in no extant Greek manuscripts and only weakly attested in the versional witnesses.
This variant demonstrates that the modern critical text editors are willing to make conjectural emendations to supply what they believe to be the best readings.
Does it Burn, or is it Exposed? (2 Peter 3:10)
https://www.petergoeman.com/burn-exposed-2-peter-310/
In this case, although κατακαήσεται (“It will be burned up”) has the most Greek manuscripts on its side, εὑρεθήσεται (“It will be found/revealed”) is actually supported by the Greek manuscripts that are dated earlier....