Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refutation to Aramaic primacists
#48
There are no Greek manuscripts, lesser known or not, which have the Greek words that Ivan split into separate words...they don't exist in the Greek text that way. They always have been and always will be one single word each. He had to do it, to make his count of words work. And I am sure if we look over his whole edited text, this wont be the only time he has done such a thing.

If you don't think changing God's words around and switching out "them" for "believers" is wrong to do, that is your bad idea. And like I said, with the licence you give yourself, I would not want to bother reading your bible, since it isn't the same as God's Bible.

Go now, and try to make your version eclipse all others in the English language and be the new King James if you can... Most people have never heard of Ivan Panin's Numeric version, and it has been around for about 100 years, I think you will have the same impact, if not much less.

And I have given my real name from the start.

.


Messages In This Thread
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-19-2014, 11:27 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-20-2014, 10:36 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 03-21-2014, 03:29 AM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Thirdwoe - 03-28-2014, 04:10 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by sestir - 04-03-2014, 06:13 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Matthew - 04-07-2014, 11:47 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 04-22-2014, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)