Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refutation to Aramaic primacists
#36
It don't bother me in the slightest if you want to keep thinking that the Greek text of Ivan Panin is the original autograph in printed form, and that his translation is the best ever in English.

I'll ask you though, if you think his translation of Acts 16:4 is good.

I have nothing against the Greek versions, I just don't find them to be that accurate. I have found the Aramaic to be so. I am not of "Eastern heritage", I'm of Western heritage.


.


Messages In This Thread
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-19-2014, 11:27 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-20-2014, 10:36 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 03-21-2014, 03:29 AM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Thirdwoe - 03-26-2014, 04:20 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by sestir - 04-03-2014, 06:13 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Matthew - 04-07-2014, 11:47 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 04-22-2014, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)