MarYah

[The Texas RAT]

I believe that marya cannot be said to -mean- YHWH.

It _is_ equivalent, and equivalently used, but it is a form of Mar (Lord).
But I'm not convinced yet that the 'ya' suffix, from marya, means YAH or YAHWEH.

(Just as alahaya is not Alaha+ Yahweh
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com/lexicon/lexeme.php?adr=1:132&font=Estrangelo+Edessa&size=150">http://www.dukhrana.com/lexicon/lexeme. ... a&size=150</a><!-- m -->%)

But since I am not an Aramaic grammar scientist, I'll just keep the comment short.

distazo, if I understand you correctly, you just claimed that you have no real understanding of the grammar within the Aramaic language yet have made your statement based solely from pure speculation(?).

Anyway, it is sad when some who have no real understanding of the Aramaic language (such as the MarYa Deception author), whom most likely learned from Greek primmest, whom teach that MarYa can not be Adon-Yah. Personally I once was one of this ilk <!-- s:whaasup: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/whaasup.gif" alt=":whaasup:" title="Whaasup" /><!-- s:whaasup: --> [re-espousing the ideocy within the MarYa deception article <!-- stupid: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/withstupid.gif" alt="tupid:" title="Stupid" /><!-- stupid: --> ] until I studied what a native born Aramaic speaker (that is one who could speak Aramaic as a child) had to say on the subject <!-- s:oha: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/oha.gif" alt=":oha:" title="Oha!" /><!-- s:oha: --> . Oy, I found myself having to repent of following after Greek primmest's lack of understanding which was steeped (solely) in speculative theology <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/blush.gif" alt="" title="Blush" /><!-- s --> , as they have yet to have any real understanding of the Aramaic language to base such an argument.

Anyway that is why I gave the link above to the thread where one/all can hear a discussion between a Greek primmest (which by the way is not a native Greek speaker, just a want to be one) and a Native Born Aramaic speaker (that's right a real live Aramaic speaking person whom was born speaking the language our Anointed One Spoke) of whom lays out the facts of grammar within the Aramaic language of from where the compound phrase MarYa originated. And on this note I encourage any and all to read the thread before chiming in on a language they have no based knowledge of just because they do not want The Divine name in the ReNewed Covenant. Got news for some of y'all - see Revelation chapter 19:1, 3, 4, & 6! There it is as plain as Greek, the phrase Allelu-Ya/aka-Hallelu-Yah [which is a narrative meaning: "Praise you Yah"!!!]. So anyone trying to argue that the Divine Name of our Heavenly Father did not make it into the ReNewed Covenant based off of the Greek translations are wasting their time.

And as for the ones who have no problem with the Divine Name being in the ReNewed Covenant but just not here or there within it, when referring to The Anointed One, based off of their understanding, or lack thereof, should go pray for more understanding until they can realize that they need not twist and rent the Scriptures to render them unto their limited understanding, as but rather they are needing to gain understanding of what the Scriptures are really saying. The Scriptures need not be rendered as there is nothing wrong with what they say, again if one studies long enough and prays for understanding sooner or later they will gain more understanding in which they had not the day before. And on that note, I have put together something that might help in this area (@: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="https://www.academia.edu/3714357/g07b_some_say_that_the_Savoir_can_not_be_called_Mar-Yah_yet_why_not">https://www.academia.edu/3714357/g07b_s ... et_why_not</a><!-- m --> ).