Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A historical logic
#8
IPOstapyuk Wrote:What I mean is the historical issue.
I not changed my mind just trying to think out of the box.

No problem in questioning, just try to imagine the whole picture rather than concentrating on one or two factors. Examine the evidence in its totality.

There is indeed a significant amount of variances between eastern and western copies of the Aramaic NT. But when you compare only eastern vs. eastern, they are only scribal errors/copy mistakes. The western tradition has far more variations amongst themselves.

+Shamasha
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-01-2013, 05:41 PM
Re: A historical logic - by distazo - 05-01-2013, 07:52 PM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-01-2013, 08:14 PM
Re: A historical logic - by distazo - 05-01-2013, 08:27 PM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-01-2013, 08:34 PM
Re: A historical logic - by distazo - 05-01-2013, 08:38 PM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-01-2013, 09:03 PM
Re: A historical logic - by Paul Younan - 05-01-2013, 10:06 PM
Re: A historical logic - by Paul Younan - 05-01-2013, 10:10 PM
Re: A historical logic - by Burning one - 05-01-2013, 11:16 PM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-02-2013, 01:57 AM
Re: A historical logic - by Paul Younan - 05-02-2013, 02:43 AM
Re: A historical logic - by Paul Younan - 05-02-2013, 03:05 AM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-02-2013, 03:58 AM
Re: A historical logic - by Paul Younan - 05-02-2013, 04:40 AM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-02-2013, 05:37 AM
Re: A historical logic - by bknight - 05-03-2013, 01:07 AM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-03-2013, 01:54 AM
Re: A historical logic - by Paul Younan - 05-03-2013, 05:30 AM
Re: A historical logic - by IPOstapyuk - 05-03-2013, 06:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)