07-31-2012, 05:27 AM
Thank you! I see that also Etheridge describes this error.
Dave Bauscher used the Crawford version for his translation. He really boasts about the quality of the manuscript and I believe his opinion on this.
Here you can see that the Crawford (??) text does not have this error.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com/peshitta/analyze_verse.php?lang=en&verse=Revelation+8:13&source=ubs&font=Estrangelo+Edessa&size=150">http://www.dukhrana.com/peshitta/analyz ... a&size=150</a><!-- m -->%
Actually, I'm not sure what source Lars Lindgren used for revelation, I thought the John Gwyn collection is the same as crawford, but it is certainly not the Harklean for the Western 5.
Dave Bauscher used the Crawford version for his translation. He really boasts about the quality of the manuscript and I believe his opinion on this.
Here you can see that the Crawford (??) text does not have this error.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com/peshitta/analyze_verse.php?lang=en&verse=Revelation+8:13&source=ubs&font=Estrangelo+Edessa&size=150">http://www.dukhrana.com/peshitta/analyz ... a&size=150</a><!-- m -->%
Actually, I'm not sure what source Lars Lindgren used for revelation, I thought the John Gwyn collection is the same as crawford, but it is certainly not the Harklean for the Western 5.