Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cod. Plut. I No. 58
#6
Shlama Akhi Paul.

Thank you very much for the clarifications!

Paul Younan Wrote:That manuscript may have been in the possession of the Church of the East at one point, perhaps from a convert or as a library edition for reference.

So this may explain the eastern vowel points, they were added by a later hand??

Edit: and of course you are right, akhi Paul <!-- s:biggrin: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/biggrin.gif" alt=":biggrin:" title="Big Grin" /><!-- s:biggrin: --> I take a look at the critical apparatus of the Pusey and Gwilliam editiion of the Gospels corresponding to Add. 7157, and some passages like Mt. 6:32, Mt. 21:4, Mk. 4:18, etc. were corrected by a later hand to match the eastern reading.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by g_a_kowalski - 03-28-2011, 11:08 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 03-28-2011, 03:35 PM
Re: Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by Phil - 03-28-2011, 06:17 PM
Re: Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by Paul Younan - 03-29-2011, 03:24 AM
Re: Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by g_a_kowalski - 03-29-2011, 09:39 AM
Re: Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by Phil - 03-29-2011, 12:18 PM
Re: Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by Paul Younan - 03-29-2011, 10:30 PM
Re: Cod. Plut. I No. 58 - by Paul Younan - 03-29-2011, 10:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)