11-12-2010, 05:48 AM
I also recommend you these websites if you are looking for more Aramaic texts.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/">http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/</a><!-- m -->
This website has Lamsa's version, Etheridge Translation and Murdock Translation.
Lamsa's version is good. But not great. He lets his beliefs affect his translations in places. Etheridge and Murdock Translations are good. But they weren't aramaic primacists. So some of the mistranslations ended up in their versions.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com/crawford/">http://www.dukhrana.com/crawford/</a><!-- m -->
This website (on the top) has Crawford Codex (2nd Peter, 2nd John, 3rd John, Jude, and Revelation). I think Crawford Codex was written around 11th or 12th century. But they do have some qualities of the Original Aramaic manuscript.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/">http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/</a><!-- m -->
This website has Lamsa's version, Etheridge Translation and Murdock Translation.
Lamsa's version is good. But not great. He lets his beliefs affect his translations in places. Etheridge and Murdock Translations are good. But they weren't aramaic primacists. So some of the mistranslations ended up in their versions.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com/crawford/">http://www.dukhrana.com/crawford/</a><!-- m -->
This website (on the top) has Crawford Codex (2nd Peter, 2nd John, 3rd John, Jude, and Revelation). I think Crawford Codex was written around 11th or 12th century. But they do have some qualities of the Original Aramaic manuscript.