07-06-2005, 05:26 PM
Your forgetting the audience here Dave, those who are weighing this portion of scripture;
-I have concentrated on the scripture portions, you have made accusations over my person and provided theories of implication to change the subject rather than provide scripture.
-I have presented 10 different sections of scripture with following explanations in my defense, you have sidestepped these portions to lead into other sections and books of the bible rather than present anything in your defense.
-I have attempted to narrow the focus into one section of scripture, instead of the outside evidence, you have ignored that and continued to mislead with wrong usage of scripture that is away from the evidence presented.
Your avoiding this and refusing to present evidence that counters the claims presented. The burden of proof is currently upon you in this matter Dave. You have proclaimed complete originality of this syriac text, and I have pointed out an area that the text does not agree with the rest of scripture.
Please refrain from the banter and try to concentrate on those areas that require answers so as to justify the your claims. It's not about me here at the moment Dave, it is about the text.
I have centered in on the evidence of the text, and pulled back from the church father evidence. So there you go.
Please provide answers to each portion of evidence submitted so as to justify you claim for this particular area. If your unable to find said evidence to justify you position here, then your unable to make claims of originality for the text.
Again, as the apostle Paul said, "Is Christ divided?"
-I have concentrated on the scripture portions, you have made accusations over my person and provided theories of implication to change the subject rather than provide scripture.
-I have presented 10 different sections of scripture with following explanations in my defense, you have sidestepped these portions to lead into other sections and books of the bible rather than present anything in your defense.
-I have attempted to narrow the focus into one section of scripture, instead of the outside evidence, you have ignored that and continued to mislead with wrong usage of scripture that is away from the evidence presented.
Your avoiding this and refusing to present evidence that counters the claims presented. The burden of proof is currently upon you in this matter Dave. You have proclaimed complete originality of this syriac text, and I have pointed out an area that the text does not agree with the rest of scripture.
Please refrain from the banter and try to concentrate on those areas that require answers so as to justify the your claims. It's not about me here at the moment Dave, it is about the text.
I have centered in on the evidence of the text, and pulled back from the church father evidence. So there you go.
Please provide answers to each portion of evidence submitted so as to justify you claim for this particular area. If your unable to find said evidence to justify you position here, then your unable to make claims of originality for the text.
Again, as the apostle Paul said, "Is Christ divided?"