Matthew 28:19

[gbausc]

I have already answered you, Dave.
My so called "Little Syriac text" happens to agree with "The Big Greek text" and every other text you can produce.
Where is the manuscript that reads different ?

So far, all I have seen is a quotation of Eusebius, and even he quotes differently in different places.
And even if Shem Tob has omitted The trinity in Matthew 28:19, given its edited nature throughout,it carries no weight with me in those places where it differs.


So your "best example" proves, not only that the Peshitta is false, but every known manuscript of the text in question, in every known language of man. So where did the reading come from - The Peshitta- "My Little Syriac text" ? Sounds like The Mouse that Roared to me !

If not, where did it come from, the Greek ? If so, why are you piccking on "My Little Syriac" ?

And if it didn't come from Greek, where did it come from ? If it did, how can it be that not one of 5000 Greek mss. has it right ? The oldest Greek ms. goes back to AD 125, right ?

Do you deny that "Christ" means "The Anointed One ?" Do you deny that The Father anointed Him ?
Do you deny the He anointed Him with the Holy Spirit ? Which of these is false ?
Do you accept Acts 10:38, or will you edit that verse also, without any ms. evidence ?

If you have real faith in scripture, Dave, then you accept the above three statements about the Trinity.

It is a simple and logical step from there to see that The Name of "Jesus Christ", or "Yeshua Meshikha", includes The Trinity. Every verse that mentions baptism mentions the Name of Jesus Christ, and as such, includes the concept of the Trinity- "Father,Son and Spirit" .

Is this a lie from Satan ?

I think not ! I think it makes Satan pretty upset, actually.