Mattai 15:23 - big proof? Younan Interlinear in error?

[byrnesey]

Yes, in fact as far as I know, ALL translations have this negative reading, similar to other big mistakes like "why have you forsaken me" and "the husband of Mary". What I am basically saying is that the Aramaic can have both positive and negative meanings, and given the context, it is the positive meaning that should be seen, even though it may make Jesus look nasty. But to be honest, the whole "non-Jews are dogs" thing sounds nasty anyway! So it surely won't harm Jesus' image to interpret this as the positive manner, which makes sense of the next few verses.