03-25-2014, 03:51 AM
When I asked you to find a "mistranslation", as you allege is found in the Aramaic New Testament, I meant just that...a mistranslation of a Greek word into an Aramaic word, which misses the sense or has the wrong word being rendered incorrectly.
Now, either the Aramaic New Testament is the worlds first error free translation of another language, or it is the indeed The Original New Testament Text.
I'm still looking for proof it is a translation of the Greek...and so far (years now), no one can seem to prove it is, by the text itself. They have their assumptions, and opinions, but totally lacking in any substantive textual proof that shows that The Peshitta (Eastern Text), is just a translation from a Greek text.
And...they can't even point out which Greek text would be the source, since it doesn't follow any of them in every place, having some readings of all the various Greek families present in its text. Its text has remained static for nearly 2000 years...while the Greek and Latin text, has gone through various changes and come down in various textual family forms, no one quite sure which is the more original of the bunch.
Not to mention all the English translations of the Greek and Latin texts...it is just the nature of translations to have so many variant readings and versions.
There is only ONE version of The Eastern Aramaic Peshitta New Testament...unchanged since the time it was 1st given to the Church of the East by the hands of the Apostles.
And please answer my question in our side chat, about what Greek text Mr. Panin used to come up with his 175 words for the text of Mark 16:9-20. I hope you wont say he constructed his own Greek text, then came up with the number that he says is a miracle, making his own miracle... If you can point me to any one Greek manuscript, that was available to Mr. Panin to count those 175 words...then I would like to know which one it was, so I can check his count.
Here are some that were available during his lifetime.
Elzevir's edition of the Textus Receptus (1624) =166
Wilson (1864) =165
Alford (1874) =166
Westcott and Hort (1881) =172
Weymouth (1886) =167
Nestle (1898) =168
Souter (1902) =166
Nestle (1904) =168
Souter (1910) =168
Huck (1936) =167
Souter (1947) =169
.
Now, either the Aramaic New Testament is the worlds first error free translation of another language, or it is the indeed The Original New Testament Text.
I'm still looking for proof it is a translation of the Greek...and so far (years now), no one can seem to prove it is, by the text itself. They have their assumptions, and opinions, but totally lacking in any substantive textual proof that shows that The Peshitta (Eastern Text), is just a translation from a Greek text.
And...they can't even point out which Greek text would be the source, since it doesn't follow any of them in every place, having some readings of all the various Greek families present in its text. Its text has remained static for nearly 2000 years...while the Greek and Latin text, has gone through various changes and come down in various textual family forms, no one quite sure which is the more original of the bunch.
Not to mention all the English translations of the Greek and Latin texts...it is just the nature of translations to have so many variant readings and versions.
There is only ONE version of The Eastern Aramaic Peshitta New Testament...unchanged since the time it was 1st given to the Church of the East by the hands of the Apostles.
And please answer my question in our side chat, about what Greek text Mr. Panin used to come up with his 175 words for the text of Mark 16:9-20. I hope you wont say he constructed his own Greek text, then came up with the number that he says is a miracle, making his own miracle... If you can point me to any one Greek manuscript, that was available to Mr. Panin to count those 175 words...then I would like to know which one it was, so I can check his count.
Here are some that were available during his lifetime.
Elzevir's edition of the Textus Receptus (1624) =166
Wilson (1864) =165
Alford (1874) =166
Westcott and Hort (1881) =172
Weymouth (1886) =167
Nestle (1898) =168
Souter (1902) =166
Nestle (1904) =168
Souter (1910) =168
Huck (1936) =167
Souter (1947) =169
.