Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aramaic/Greek manuscripts
#1
In our primacy discussions we take many corrupted versions of Greek Manuscripts and even English averaged translations of these versions for comparison base as to show and prove Aramaic primacy.
These versions are contradictory among themselves and therefore are corruptions and lies.
I do not think it is a good idea to keep digging in these lies and show them as proofs.

On the other side we have different versions of Aramaic NT: Diatessaron, Curetonian, Sinaic, Philoxenian, Peshitto, Peshitta. So, we decided to keep to the official text of the Church: Peshitta (22 books). It is right.

Next, I saw on the Internet explanation that Greek speaking heretics (I like to add probability
that many on purpose corruptions) did corruptions to the Greek NT to suit their beliefs but Greek Church preserved one official text as we have today. Sounds good and logical.

OK, here we go. Easy proof of Aramaic primacy.
Luke 1:75
Peshitta "..all our days..."
Official Greek Orthodox Church NT
"...all days of our life."

Here Greek text looks like amplified translation with better explanation.
On the other side, if original was "...all days of our life." then
Peshitta would have "...all days of our life."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Aramaic/Greek manuscripts - by IPOstapyuk - 06-29-2012, 04:14 AM
Re: Aramaic/Greek manuscripts - by judge - 07-02-2012, 02:00 AM
Re: Aramaic/Greek manuscripts - by samdav7 - 08-31-2012, 11:01 PM
Re: Aramaic/Greek manuscripts - by distazo - 09-01-2012, 05:49 AM
Re: Aramaic/Greek manuscripts - by distazo - 09-01-2012, 05:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)