09-14-2010, 10:48 PM
for over 1000 years, the byzantium text, was considered the most reliable source.
In Europe, it was the vulgate until the protestant movement made the KJV translation etc.
Then in the 19th century, the W&H+NA variants became the 'standard'
During all the KJV times, the Belgium 'Antwerp Polyglot' (having the aramaic edessa version) and probably other bibles, had the Aramaic version as well.
since there is / was a lack of scientists that consider the Aramaic as the language of Jesus and -all- middle-east semitic people, it might take a few hundred years before they finally switch to the idea that Greek was just a translation of...
However, more and more Bible translations are being made from the Aramaic sources. Not so long ago, the Codex Khabouris became known. So, it progresses more and more.
Have faith... <!-- s
--><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->
In Europe, it was the vulgate until the protestant movement made the KJV translation etc.
Then in the 19th century, the W&H+NA variants became the 'standard'
During all the KJV times, the Belgium 'Antwerp Polyglot' (having the aramaic edessa version) and probably other bibles, had the Aramaic version as well.
since there is / was a lack of scientists that consider the Aramaic as the language of Jesus and -all- middle-east semitic people, it might take a few hundred years before they finally switch to the idea that Greek was just a translation of...
However, more and more Bible translations are being made from the Aramaic sources. Not so long ago, the Codex Khabouris became known. So, it progresses more and more.
Have faith... <!-- s
--><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->