Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does it matter if Aramaic Primacy is wrong?
#11
Thank you abudar for your kind explanation.

Jesus must be preaching to His people in Aramaic because He is from the Aramaic native speaking and His Hearers are Aramaic speaking too. So the Holy Name of God in Aramaic must be known without a shadow of doubt. Otherwise Aramaic Primacy serves no purpose.

abudar2000 Wrote:shlomo Positron,

El is spelled => ayl (vocalised eel or el)
Alaha is spelled => alha

Is Elohim (spelled alhym) in Hebrew a proper usage?
(the "ym" in Hebrew is for the plural of "alh" (in Aramaic the "ym" would be "yn"))

Is the use of YHWH a proper usage?

The use of Alaha is in the biblical manuscript of Daniel (from Qumran -- 4QDan-a-112 (around 100BC)), were they wrong to use it?
?????? ????????????[ ????]?????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ???????? [???? ??]???????? ??????

push bashlomo,
keefa-morun


In Gospel of Jesus according to John 10:36 (Jesus said) ..."I am The Son of God"

Is it right to translate as "I am The Son of Allah"?
Is Aloha the same word as Allah in Arabic?

There are some who claimed that "Allah" is found in Aramaic Peshitta Bible which is the true name of God. What do you have to say about this issue?
How can we know for sure that Aramaic Peshitta is not altered by any scribes and the name Alha is most Holy Name of God of Abraham and Father of Jesus?

What is the Most Holy Name of GOD in Aramaic?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Does it matter if Aramaic Primacy is wrong? - by positron - 10-19-2008, 01:05 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)