Does it matter if Aramaic Primacy is wrong?

[Paul Younan]

It could be that Q existed, and that it contained the Aramaic words of Jesus used both for the Peshitta and the Greek New Testament.

But again, if Q ever existed and is now lost then it stands that the original words of Christ are lost.

What if "Q" is really the Peshitta, and the evidence shows it? What if it's never been lost? What if Christendom has preserved it?

+Shamasha