04-17-2004, 02:01 AM
Again, very interesting Paul!
So, we have an Aramaic manuscript that really isn't Aramaic, we have Palestinian Aramaic that really isn't Aramaic also!
Also Paul, I just was reading about the Harklean version, that the Apostle Pauls epistles were the western type in this particular version also. Seems like there is quite a few Greek versions that were translated into Aramaic here, huh?!?
Ever checked the Harklean version out before Paul? I'm just curious if this is the same thing.
So, we have an Aramaic manuscript that really isn't Aramaic, we have Palestinian Aramaic that really isn't Aramaic also!
Also Paul, I just was reading about the Harklean version, that the Apostle Pauls epistles were the western type in this particular version also. Seems like there is quite a few Greek versions that were translated into Aramaic here, huh?!?
Ever checked the Harklean version out before Paul? I'm just curious if this is the same thing.

