04-11-2025, 09:56 PM
Do you disagree with any of this?:
H. Louis Ginsberg, _Studies in Daniel_ (1948), 92pp., on 41
https://www.amazon.com/Studies-Daniel-Lo...873341074/
https://archive.org/details/studiesindan...zimmermann
Page n56
That the Hebrew portions of Daniel (i.e. chs. 1-2:4a; 8-12) are, with the exception of the obvious interpolation 9:4-20,^1 translated from Aramaic originals is a hypothesis of long standing, but was only demonstrated by Zimmermann 1938 and 1939.^2
As Baumgartner observes,^3 not all of Zimmermann’s arguments are cogent, and I shall have occasion to criticize some of them in the course of this Section, but some are so telling that they suffice to establish his thesis.
H. Louis Ginsberg, _Studies in Daniel_ (1948), 92pp., on 41
https://www.amazon.com/Studies-Daniel-Lo...873341074/
https://archive.org/details/studiesindan...zimmermann
Page n56
That the Hebrew portions of Daniel (i.e. chs. 1-2:4a; 8-12) are, with the exception of the obvious interpolation 9:4-20,^1 translated from Aramaic originals is a hypothesis of long standing, but was only demonstrated by Zimmermann 1938 and 1939.^2
As Baumgartner observes,^3 not all of Zimmermann’s arguments are cogent, and I shall have occasion to criticize some of them in the course of this Section, but some are so telling that they suffice to establish his thesis.