Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refutation to Aramaic primacists
#53
I figured as much. This was to show the others that you are a pretender, and just want to promote Ivan's text, and your own version of it in English. And you seem to think that people should just accept that they are "the best" and "the God sanctioned" versions of the New Testament.

You see...There are no split words in the Greek text of Codex Alexandrinus, where you claim Ivan used to get his readings...and Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus doesn't even have the passage, so, he didn't get them there either.

The fact is, he made it up himself, so he could count 175 words, rather than the actual 172 words that his W&H text had there....which didn't do the trick...so, he did a trick himself to make it fly.

This is just one example of I'm sure other places, such as in 1 Cor 13:3...where I see he did a similar thing, and split words up to make it work.

And with this post....I'm done talking about it. If you have something else to talk about, say about the actual text of the Aramaic New Testament, which this site is all about...then I am happy to discuss.

-Chuck

.


Messages In This Thread
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-19-2014, 11:27 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-20-2014, 10:36 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 03-21-2014, 03:29 AM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Thirdwoe - 03-30-2014, 05:14 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by sestir - 04-03-2014, 06:13 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Matthew - 04-07-2014, 11:47 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 04-22-2014, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)