Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refutation to Aramaic primacists
#50
.

Don't be fooled by this guy who won't say who he really is...

His latest post there is just another cut an paste job, by the king of cut and paste.

If he didn't know how to do that trick, he would have to type his own words out. But, why do that, when he can just use other peoples words and math and act like he did it himself. <!-- sSmile --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><!-- sSmile -->

As I said, Ivan Panin's version of the Greek NT, and his translation from his own edited version, has been available to the public for some 100 years now, and very few have paid it any attention.

I would gather that not even close to 1% of the population of the world has ever heard of him, or if they had, has actually bothered to read his translation or check out what he has said he sees in the numbers in the Greek text (which he himself constructed over what is claimed to be 12 hours a day for 50 years)...I say that is horse apples, and even if it were true...it might take that long to stitch a whole NT together the way you wanted it to work, with the numbers just right.

But, in any case....I have shown just one example here, of his handiwork, were he fudges the text...cooked the book so to speak, so that he could arrive at his desired number 175 to make his multiples of 7 "miracle" work out in Mark 16:9-20.

GP (Greek Primacist)....Let's test something out. "Test all things"

Look in Panin's Greek text of Mark 16: vs 11, vs 13, and vs 18...and then tell me which words he split in two there. Then tell me if the split parts to the right, is an actual Greek word or not. And then tell me in which manuscript he found it like that in...if you say he didn't split them in two himself.

Also...you said this:

Quote:1/3rd of the Peshitta doesn't even make sense;

Have you, or can you even read the Aramaic text? Or do you just go off a translation, in these cases which are lacking in many respects, and are not even the actual Peshitta text...to many's amazement.

And which 1/3rd of the text do you say makes no sense? Any real proof? Or just your false and lying statement...or maybe your misguided assumptions? Either way...=a lie... i.e. a false witness.

I take it that you have never read or studied the actual Aramaic New Testament, then?



.


Messages In This Thread
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-19-2014, 11:27 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-20-2014, 10:36 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 03-21-2014, 03:29 AM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Thirdwoe - 03-29-2014, 05:41 AM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by sestir - 04-03-2014, 06:13 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Matthew - 04-07-2014, 11:47 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 04-22-2014, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)