12-08-2003, 10:48 AM
Larry Kelsey Wrote:The "no less than 285 O. T. references" that E. W. Bullinger refers to makes me lean toward a lost Aramaic or Hebrew original. Either that or some Greek-speaking Jew had Rukha d'Qodsha move upon him very mightily.
Having 285 O.T. references isn't any kind of proof of an Aramaic or Hebrew original. Although, it may be proof that the theology (compare with Paul's especially) of Revelation is different (more dependant on the OT) than that of the Peshitta.
Shlama, Craig

