Paul Younan Interlinear

[distazo]

Aramaic Revelation has ample evidences of errors. though the Greek itself is no walk-in-the-park, from what i understand of it. 2nd Peter also appears quite different. even the "tone" of books like 2nd Peter, 2nd / 3rd John read *differently* in the Aramaic from the first of both books. i'm sure others here could validate my observation from the Aramaic.

i actually don't have a list in front of me of the disparate errors, but that brings up a great opportunity to get one compiled. i do know there are

Chayim b'Moshiach,
Jeremy

I've done work on it and it's based on Dave's Bauschers translation. It's merely missing some words when we compare with the Greek.
However, the Greek version, is even critized by the biblecritics, for having those lines, which they doubt to be authentic.
Eg: Greek rev 20:5 speaks about the 1000 years. It is out of context.

Further, it contains a poem, which points to authenicity.
What errors do exist in the Aramaic revelation?