12-22-2011, 04:12 AM
There is nothing wrong with scholarly criticism of the possible differences in translation and scholarly presentation or alternative and even more appropriate interpretations. I would not claim that Lamsa's translation is perfect. But personal attacks on Lamsa and unfounded accusatioons are un-called-or , undesirable, and quite destructive to the goals of Aramaic primacy.
We need to build upward rather than tearr down
We need to build upward rather than tearr down

