10-06-2010, 11:16 PM
Otto, i am not trying to disagre with you, but it should be noted that in any textual history from any period of time, the longer text is usually the later text. those omissions may very well me additions, and merely because you say they are omissions (with no factual base, in fact i have never heard anyone give a good argument as to how they deducted those verses were removed, not added). does not make them so. Though the bible clearly differs from all the texts in the world, those that altered the text do not differ a bit from those who altered all the other ancient and modern text. Addition is very most of the times the way of development (people add to clarify), omission is only used by extreme radicals with very clear agendas, which, in case of the bible, would be people believeing in Revelation's curse, and thus they would not dare to omit.
Jesus is the one true God of the Bible.