Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To Andrew: Concerning Josephus
#3
Rafa Wrote:I believe you Andrew. I mean, Josephus knew Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic perfectly. In a society where something like ninety percent of the population was illiterate that makes him a genius, so its perfectly feasible that he "coded" his beliefs in his writings (using his mastery Hebrew) for future generations to discover. That description of the bright light, that is no "sword"...that's a cross! I know Josephus wasn't the Bishop (Nasi) of Jerusalem obviously, I was thinking maybe that he hinted that he was an informal leader like you said. Thanks for communicating this research here to me, very interesting. Should I look in the "Antiquities" for most of the clues?
If it was a cross, why didn't Josephus say so? With the number of executions by cross that were done in those days it would have been no kind of give-away. Not to mention that Roman swords did not have the dramatic hilts of later Medieval swords, and so a Roman sword would not resemble a cross very much at all. This calls to mind more the "Messiah" Bar-Kochba than Rabbeynu Yeshua HaMashicah.
He could have coded his works. True. But I thought that Netzarim weren't supposed to disguise our beliefs.
Knowing multiple languages didn't make him a genius. It made him a member of the privileged elite, and what's more it made him looked down upon among his people, who despised Greek learning. He had opportunity to learn Greek, not a special ability.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: To Andrew: Concerning Josephus - by Dawid - 05-11-2009, 04:45 PM
Re: To Andrew: Concerning Josephus - by Dawid - 05-11-2009, 07:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)