10-17-2003, 06:16 AM
my GOD this is deep!
Here's the funny part, it also seems that the Jeconiah problem is presented on purpose here, to show that Joseph could not claim Jesus as his legit son by nature, since he had this bloodline in him, but the throne could be legit through Mary. Nowhere in the word does it mention of a lifting of this curse from Jeconiah's bloodline. GOD says: "As I live,..."
"The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David." This is divine decree here, given to Mary,....hmmmm. The throne of David was legit through Mary, divine promise. The requirement for the throne of Israel was prophetic sanction or divine appointment. Anyone who attempted to rule on Samaria's throne without prophetic sanction was assassinated (1 Kings 11:26-39; 15:28-30; 16:1-4, 11-15; 21:21-29; 11 Kings 9:6-10; 10:29-31; 14 8-12).
Many things going on here in this, very tricky in parts. Matthews genealogy, although a kingly lineage, shows why Jesus could not be King through him because of Joseph, on purpose it seems, and the problem was only solved through Mary.
Now Mary, since she had no brothers that are listed, was an heiress; therefore her husband, according to Jewish law, was reckoned among her father's family, as his son. So Joseph was that actual son of Jacob, and the legal son of Heli.
From here I'm seeing why GOD was adamant about Joseph accepting Mary as his wife, and how Matthew's Gospel attests to the virgin birth because of Joseph.
From here i have to claim a wrong on my part. I claimed the title came through Joseph. At this point, I'll have to wait for some guidance from The LORD on it, and claim i was wrong by default.
Here's the funny part, it also seems that the Jeconiah problem is presented on purpose here, to show that Joseph could not claim Jesus as his legit son by nature, since he had this bloodline in him, but the throne could be legit through Mary. Nowhere in the word does it mention of a lifting of this curse from Jeconiah's bloodline. GOD says: "As I live,..."
"The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David." This is divine decree here, given to Mary,....hmmmm. The throne of David was legit through Mary, divine promise. The requirement for the throne of Israel was prophetic sanction or divine appointment. Anyone who attempted to rule on Samaria's throne without prophetic sanction was assassinated (1 Kings 11:26-39; 15:28-30; 16:1-4, 11-15; 21:21-29; 11 Kings 9:6-10; 10:29-31; 14 8-12).
Many things going on here in this, very tricky in parts. Matthews genealogy, although a kingly lineage, shows why Jesus could not be King through him because of Joseph, on purpose it seems, and the problem was only solved through Mary.
Now Mary, since she had no brothers that are listed, was an heiress; therefore her husband, according to Jewish law, was reckoned among her father's family, as his son. So Joseph was that actual son of Jacob, and the legal son of Heli.
From here I'm seeing why GOD was adamant about Joseph accepting Mary as his wife, and how Matthew's Gospel attests to the virgin birth because of Joseph.
From here i have to claim a wrong on my part. I claimed the title came through Joseph. At this point, I'll have to wait for some guidance from The LORD on it, and claim i was wrong by default.