03-28-2011, 06:17 PM
Shlama g_a_kowalski and Paul,
That is indeed a manuscript of the Western tradition. But Eastern Peshitta manuscripts also sometimes have the Eusebian Canons. See for example B.M. Add. 7157 (a facsimile page here <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.archive.org/stream/catalogueofsyria03brituoft#page/n70/mode/1up">http://www.archive.org/stream/catalogue ... 0/mode/1up</a><!-- m -->)
For more about the Eusebian Canons in Aramaic manuscripts, see this work:
The Ammonian Sections, Eusebian Canons and Harmonizing Tables in the Syriac Tetraevangelium [G. H. Gwilliam] <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.archive.org/stream/studiabiblicaess02univ#page/241/mode/1up">http://www.archive.org/stream/studiabib ... 1/mode/1up</a><!-- m -->
That is indeed a manuscript of the Western tradition. But Eastern Peshitta manuscripts also sometimes have the Eusebian Canons. See for example B.M. Add. 7157 (a facsimile page here <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.archive.org/stream/catalogueofsyria03brituoft#page/n70/mode/1up">http://www.archive.org/stream/catalogue ... 0/mode/1up</a><!-- m -->)
For more about the Eusebian Canons in Aramaic manuscripts, see this work:
The Ammonian Sections, Eusebian Canons and Harmonizing Tables in the Syriac Tetraevangelium [G. H. Gwilliam] <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.archive.org/stream/studiabiblicaess02univ#page/241/mode/1up">http://www.archive.org/stream/studiabib ... 1/mode/1up</a><!-- m -->