02-02-2005, 03:54 PM
Don't be picking on Old Scratch, it has been through many wars. Just cause it calls people women sometimes is no case to throw it away! <!-- s
--><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/poketoungeb.gif" alt="
" title="Poke Tounge" /><!-- s
-->
Ok, the gender can be shown back in Genesis of The Spirit of God as Feminine, and I understand how this relates into syriac and aramaic (and I was learning a bit about this as I learn Hebrew), but you used english without translating the gender to me?!
If the gender is to be shown, it correspondes to the structure around it, this is what you appear to be saying.
So,........Paul,..........what is the correct translation with the gender in this particular passage of Romans??



Quote:Not so in Aramaic. In Aramaic, articles like "that" (and many other components of grammar, i.e. verbs and adjectives) must agree in gender (and number) with their noun counterparts.
Ok, the gender can be shown back in Genesis of The Spirit of God as Feminine, and I understand how this relates into syriac and aramaic (and I was learning a bit about this as I learn Hebrew), but you used english without translating the gender to me?!
If the gender is to be shown, it correspondes to the structure around it, this is what you appear to be saying.
So,........Paul,..........what is the correct translation with the gender in this particular passage of Romans??