12-15-2012, 03:44 PM
Sure, when I'm all done my list I can do that. In the meantime, here's some quick updates,
Mark 14:53 (second unneeded "were" taken out)
Luke 11:32 (Yonan name correction)
John 9:21 (removed "he")
Acts 8:5 - (Meshikha updated to Mashiyach)
2 Corinthians 7:11, 15, and 2 Thessalonians 2:14 - (older English updated)
Revelation 11:4 (Master YHWH corrected to Master; corrected in an older edition but posted here for Chuck)
And... I wanted to get your guys' take on an updated, amplified passage. 2 Corinthians 13:5 - "Don't you acknowledge that Y'shua the Mashiyach is in you? And if he is not, you are despised and against Torah."
There is a very lengthy footnote explaining that this is a double simultaneous exploitation of the singular word and root maslaya, a competent synonym for being against namusa/auryata. Elsewhere this same word remains as lawbreakers (i.e. verse 7). I found this to be an interesting and bold statement, although looking into it myself I can see how this translation has come about. Also interesting to note is that in this verse "he is" is taken out of brackets, even though it is added for clarity by Murdock. Hmm...
Anyway, just an update, but my list is at about 50-60 errors (I have 61 points, and although most of them are errors, a few of them are merely suggestions or pointing out something like transliteration inconsistency).
Mark 14:53 (second unneeded "were" taken out)
Luke 11:32 (Yonan name correction)
John 9:21 (removed "he")
Acts 8:5 - (Meshikha updated to Mashiyach)
2 Corinthians 7:11, 15, and 2 Thessalonians 2:14 - (older English updated)
Revelation 11:4 (Master YHWH corrected to Master; corrected in an older edition but posted here for Chuck)
And... I wanted to get your guys' take on an updated, amplified passage. 2 Corinthians 13:5 - "Don't you acknowledge that Y'shua the Mashiyach is in you? And if he is not, you are despised and against Torah."
There is a very lengthy footnote explaining that this is a double simultaneous exploitation of the singular word and root maslaya, a competent synonym for being against namusa/auryata. Elsewhere this same word remains as lawbreakers (i.e. verse 7). I found this to be an interesting and bold statement, although looking into it myself I can see how this translation has come about. Also interesting to note is that in this verse "he is" is taken out of brackets, even though it is added for clarity by Murdock. Hmm...
Anyway, just an update, but my list is at about 50-60 errors (I have 61 points, and although most of them are errors, a few of them are merely suggestions or pointing out something like transliteration inconsistency).