Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eastern variant ?!?!?
#4
Paul Younan Wrote:Does Norton give any indication which manuscript it is that reads "unleavened?"

No, he doesn't akhi, and I've tried to get some more insight from different keyword searches and have scored a big zero unfortunately. <!-- sSad --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/sad.gif" alt="Sad" title="Sad" /><!-- sSad -->

What makes this such an interesting example is not only is there so much negativity ascribed to leaven by Yeshua and Paul but the reference in 1st Cor. 5:8 seems to allude very strongly to the Feast of Unleavened Bread from what I gather. I'm wondering if the placement or conception of the 'la' negative is the only real problem here either way. <!-- sSmile --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><!-- sSmile --> 'not with leaven' versus 'not leavened.' <!-- sWink --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/wink1.gif" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /><!-- sWink -->

Shlama w'Burkate, Larry Kelsey
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Eastern variant ?!?!? - by Larry Kelsey - 04-26-2004, 02:59 AM
Re: Eastern variant ?!?!? - by abudar2000 - 04-26-2004, 03:18 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-26-2004, 03:52 AM
[No subject] - by Larry Kelsey - 04-26-2004, 04:16 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-26-2004, 04:42 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)