Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
But wasn't Matthew written in Hebrew?
There is something in the genealogy presented by Mattai following the Peshitta manuscript that personally doesnt make sense to me. It seems obviously that Mattai formed and presented the genealogy of Yeshua in an structure based in the number 14, to show that Yeshua was the Mashiach son of David and the one that is able to sit in the throne of David. When you write David "Dalet, Vav, Dalet" the numerical value is 14, but the Peshitta follows the other form to write the name David like Dalet, Vav, Yod, Dalet, that has the numerical value of 24, which doesnt match with the structure presented by Mattai based in the number 14. I would like to know your opinion about this, personally i prefer the Peshitta instead of the greek texts, i like very much the Peshitta, and i always try to find more evidence to say that the Peshitta is the most original manuscript, but in this one its seems to me that there is something wrong.


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by trettep - 06-03-2005, 04:21 PM
Re: But wasn't Matthew written in Hebrew? - by Iejezquel - 05-17-2012, 07:27 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)