Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Conder/Aramaic debate commentary
#8
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.e-commercesolutions.net/members/darrellwconder/NTHistory.html">http://www.e-commercesolutions.net/memb ... story.html</a><!-- m -->

Interesting... On one side, Conder accurately tells that the 1st Century Judeans probably couldn't speak Greek, but at the same time, rejects that the Original NT is the Aramaic Peshitta. He makes some claims about teh Peshitta...

Perhaps then, Paul, you, I whoever should challenge him to a debate only on what he has said of it. If he rejects, who is chicken then?

You'd go for that right Paul?

nb: this possible debate would not necessarily cancel my planned debate with Conder in December
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Conder/Aramaic debate commentary - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 04:33 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 10:21 PM
Re: . - by Paul Younan - 10-18-2003, 10:30 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 10:35 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 11:18 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 11:37 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-18-2003, 11:45 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 11:46 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-18-2003, 11:49 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-18-2003, 11:59 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-19-2003, 12:16 AM
[No subject] - by Guest - 10-19-2003, 12:25 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-19-2003, 12:29 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-22-2003, 05:58 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-22-2003, 06:02 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-22-2003, 06:33 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-22-2003, 06:59 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-22-2003, 03:52 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-22-2003, 09:04 PM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-23-2003, 12:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)