genealogy, Mary the rightful king?

[Craig]

Hmm, now you change your tune Craig.

When was my tune something else?

"Finally, why I'm convinced the genealogy in Mattai HAS to be that of Maryam NOT Yosip."

trying to make something say something it doesn't is bad.

Trying to make something not say something it does say is just as bad.

That word is a dual meaning (possible dual meaning I think the wording was used), but changing it to say that it goes from so and so fathered this son and so and so fathered this son,...to end up with Mary doesn't fit the context. Also, it's a guess, an assumption, a hypothesis,...no one is certain on it.

One of these genealogies has to be that of Maryam. If the abnormal step of creating a genealogy for a woman could be taken , then it is not a big step to include a woman in her own right in her own genealogy. By your reasoning we would have to reject the entire New Testament because we have no "proof" only "assumption" and "hypothesis" that the two genealogies aren't both for Yosip, and thus we would have a direct contradiction in the most foundational parts of the NT, and thus Y'shu was a false Messiah, and since the book of Dani'el required the Messiah to appear in a timeframe around the lifetime of Y'shu then that means the Tanakh is uninspired as well and there is no God.

GOD's word is clear, crystal clear, it leaves no confusion whatsoever within it's text.

Exactly so the Peshitta is the original.

You can't make things up along the way, that is a lie.

I'm not making things up. You are refusing to accept the meaning of the word gowra that fits the internal evidence which lays out 42 generations.

Shlama, Craig