Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Paul - Mary genealogy
#3
[ON THE GENEALOGY OF JOSEPH] rak 2/85

from folia 120a-120b (in the same hand) after the superscription in the "Bryennios Codex" (H) in which the Didache is preserved (MS dated by Leontos the copyist to 1054 CE)

Joseph, the husband of Mary, from whom the Christ was born, is descended from a Levitic family, as the divine evangelists indicated. But Matthew traces Joseph's descent from David through Solomon, while Luke (says) through Nathan. Solomon and Nathan were both sons of David. Now the evangelists were silent about the ancestry of the holy virginsince it was not customary for the Hebrews nor for the divine scripture to give genealogies for women and there was a law prohibiting one family from contracting marriage (with a person) from another. Insofar as Joseph was descended from a Davidic family, he contracted to marry the holy virgin who was from his own ancestry. So they were content to indicate the ancestry of Joseph. Now there was a law that when a childless husband died, his own brother was to go to impregnate the wife and raise up an offspring for the one who had died. Thus the resultant child was, on the one hand, by nature (an offspring) of the second one, who had generated it, but by law, (offspring) of the one who died. Now, from the seed of Nathan, son of David, Levi generated Melchi. But from the seed of Solomon, Matthan generated Jacob. But when Matthan died, Melchi the son of Levi, from the family of Nathan, impregnated the mother of Jacob and generated from her Eli. This resulted in half-brothers with a common mother, Jacob and Eli. But Jacob was from the family of Solomon, while Eli was from the family of Nathan. Then when Eli, from the family of Nathan, died childless, and Jacob his (half-)brother took his (Eli's) wife he generated Joseph and raised up an offspring for his (dead) brother. So Joseph is by nature a son of the Jacob who descended from Solomon, but by law (he is son) of Eli (who descended) from Nathan.

This can be accessed from here: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.bcbsr.com/survey/sgosp1.html">http://www.bcbsr.com/survey/sgosp1.html</a><!-- m -->

I DO NOT agree with your article Paul!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Paul - Mary genealogy - by drmlanc - 10-05-2003, 11:20 AM
Re: Paul - Mary genealogy - by Paul Younan - 10-05-2003, 04:25 PM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-05-2003, 09:49 PM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-05-2003, 10:16 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 01:40 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 01:56 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 02:03 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 02:06 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 02:12 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 02:16 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 02:20 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 02:24 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 02:28 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 02:31 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 02:39 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 02:42 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 02:48 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-06-2003, 02:02 PM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 04:23 PM
[No subject] - by Guest - 10-06-2003, 05:18 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-06-2003, 05:55 PM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-06-2003, 05:58 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-06-2003, 06:06 PM
[No subject] - by Guest - 10-06-2003, 07:30 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-06-2003, 07:36 PM
[No subject] - by Guest - 10-06-2003, 09:03 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 10-06-2003, 09:07 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 10:43 PM
[No subject] - by Guest - 10-06-2003, 10:46 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-06-2003, 10:53 PM
Re: . - by Guest - 10-07-2003, 01:48 AM
[No subject] - by Guest - 10-07-2003, 02:30 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 02:40 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-07-2003, 03:02 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 03:20 AM
Re: . - by Craig - 10-07-2003, 03:30 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-07-2003, 03:38 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-07-2003, 03:41 AM
[No subject] - by Craig - 10-07-2003, 03:50 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 03:58 AM
Re: . - by Craig - 10-07-2003, 04:05 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 04:20 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 04:29 AM
[No subject] - by Craig - 10-07-2003, 04:54 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-07-2003, 08:10 AM
Re: . - by Guest - 10-07-2003, 10:49 AM
. - by drmlanc - 10-07-2003, 11:10 AM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 12:52 PM
. - by drmlanc - 10-07-2003, 07:00 PM
[No subject] - by Dave - 10-07-2003, 07:09 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)