Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
book of Hebrews: better from Greek, or Aramaic?
I agree that there doesn't appear to have been several different translations of the Aramaic into Greek.
If somebody translated the Aramaic into Greek, some copies of the Greek were circulated, and then later on that person did a few tweakings of the translation and then copies of that revision got circulated, that might explain 'split words.'

The strongest argument for Aramaic being first is mistranslations in the Greek. E.g., John 14:2 should have been translated from the Aramaic with 'it is necessary,' not 'if not.' The 3rd post down at
https://tentmaker.org/forum/judgement-an...nslations/
lists some mistranslations.

Another edition of the book at
https://pdfslide.net/documents/aramaic-p...-2008.html
is the PDF
http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pd...ngreek.pdf
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: book of Hebrews: better from Greek, or Aramaic? - by DavidFord - 12-20-2019, 03:42 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)