The Torah

[distazo]

ScorpioSniper2 wrote:

but Bauscher sometimes translates "namusa" as "Written Law"

I believe that Bauscher tries to help people understand better like
e.g Mark.1:2
Mark 1:2 - As it is written in Isaiah the prophet, Behold I send my messenger before your face, that he may prepare your way,
In Official Greek Orthodox Church NT
it says "as it is written in the prophets"...
here probably a copyist added "As it is written in Isaiah the prophet"
to help people and he thought he was improving the text.

You cannot know which one is exactly Original. I've been trying to read the evangelion di Mepharreshe. At some place, it literrally adds the Greek translation 'in Greek it is Petros', while no other Greek NT needs to add this, but the Aramaic scribe thought to clear this up by adding it.
An Aramaic name, cleared up in Aramaic text by adding the Greek translation? This is indication that the evangelion di Mepharreshe is a translation of the Greek.

In addition, I found some wordplays that the Peshitta has, but it also lacks a few! (
Maybe you can compare that, since you can read Syriac now.(And I don't)

So, it is very likely that the Mepharreshe is a translation of the Greek. Now wonder, if the wordplays automatically come in place, one could say: "Well, Jeshu spoke Aramaic, so translated from Greek to Syriac, it automatically starts having pun and wordplays."
But if that codex, lacks a lot of wordplays, which the Peshitta does have, can you say which document is _more_ original?