05-22-2012, 04:29 AM
:
Ah... I thought he looked like you pretty close there, just wondering.
So Luc, what do you say about the (pagan) word being added there and "no man" or "no one" being left out of Roth's translation, which is clearly there in the Aramaic NT and is present in Murdoch's translation, the source of Roth's edition of that book.
Any thoughts as to why?
Shlama,
Chuck
Ah... I thought he looked like you pretty close there, just wondering.
So Luc, what do you say about the (pagan) word being added there and "no man" or "no one" being left out of Roth's translation, which is clearly there in the Aramaic NT and is present in Murdoch's translation, the source of Roth's edition of that book.
Any thoughts as to why?
Shlama,
Chuck