Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof
#17
Burning one, i hear what your saying, BUT! Here we go again:

I repeat, the very thing you guys are avoiding, Paul wrote a lot of his epistles to the Epesians, Corinthians, etc correct? Well we know Aramaic wasn't their language, it was Greek. End of story, end of Aramaic primacy thesis.
Secondly, my asnwer concerning Acts 21:27 is utterly irrefutable, end of Aramaic primacy thesis.

Mr Panin who tutored Einstein, did not spend "50 YEARS" again "50 YEARS" to simply roll dice over the texts. If he realized there was no substance to what he was doing he would have given up after 3 years at most, being seeing the proof of what he was doing clearly he took all the time required to make it absolutely perfect, and he has succeeded. All of his final formulas applied show that it was so deep to get to the end of it that it showed itself to be from God, and all of the mathematics applied was extremely sound. You telling me you don't want to believe it doesn't prove anything. No one can make mathematics say what they want it to say. Mathematics is self evident and states the facts (God ordained, and created) tells us how it is, not the other way round. All your really saying is that you do not want to be astounded by the amazing "facts of scripture" proved by God's "own" mathematics. The refined and precise formulas Mr Panin came up with to prove the text, which have since been verified and calculated insofar as the text is concerned amounting to odds of quintillion's and quadrillions to one, is hardly guess work my friend, surely you can see that? Dismissing such overwhelming evidence is merely saying you couldn't care less, you're more interested in believing something else. 50 years work from a "professor of mathematics" who gains independent specialist verification of the odds of his calculations being hundreds of billions to one cannot be dismissed. In fact nothing in the known natural universe can repudiate that. Standing there and telling me the sky isn't blue is not going to achieve anything. That the mathematically verified text is final is a lot more valid than what is essentially misplaced skewed bits of history being manipulated to fit a theory based on making bits of information say what someone "wants" it to say.


Clearly, the reason those eastern churches got the epistles delivered personally (if the elders of those churches weren't lying) is because Paul either straight away or soon after had copies done of the "GREEK EPISTLES WRITTEN TO GREEK SPEAKING GREEKS" DID I SAY GREEKS? MAYBE I FORGOT TO SAY GREEKS, maybe i better say GREEKS again in case i forgot to say GREEKS LIVING IN GREECE!!!!!!! SHEEESH!!!!!!!

ACTS 21:27 try reading my previous explanation again, and then tell me you still believe in Aramaic primacy. SHEEESH!!!!!!! And the reason acts 21: 27-34 states "When they heard him speak to them in the HEBREW language, is because Aramaic is HEBREW, its not a sister language, its a DIALECT of HEBREW. Luke wrote the word HEBREW, not Aramaic!

Panin didn't insert any "made up words or verse" into the final text, he was experimenting early on with certain things as part of his work. The final text - I'm sure you guys must have downloaded it by now (yes there is a translated version of it at the same place), i've given the website here enough times. Read the preface and that will give you some insight. I would rather have one bit of FACT than 10,000 bits of info which can be made to substantiate a theory if someone really wants it to.
All the final text did was verify certain things in the modern new testament texts that we have known for quite a while, I am utterly familiar with the Greek texts and Mr Panins text does not add or take away anything t6hat is not already in dispute between various text families, all it does is confirm which text was more corrupted that others. Nothing dubious going on their matey.

God is well known for taking imperfect things and creating marvelous results with it, God takes imperfect people and turns them into gems, God takes dust and turns it into humans, it was not his fault that people corrupted the texts, no more than it is His fault if someone jumps in front of a moving train. But the fact is that we have had 95% of what he wanted us to know, and that was more than enough. It just so happens that now through Panin we have a verified "PERFECT" text. But it most certainly would have been incompetent of God to give Greek texts to the west if they were originally written in Aramaic, and as we all really know they weren't.

Let me make your job easier for you, if you insist on believing the texts were originally written in Aramaic, then to save any confusion for yourself when you want to know what was really said when the Aramaic is ambiguous, simply look at the Greek, problem solved. Retro comparing the Greek and then making that mean that the Aramaic was written first is not sound in the least, surely you must know that???

so PLEASE take some time with a truly open mind if you truly love the truth, and you will be surprised. The Greek primacy assertions are play-school level to some, simply because "God has taken the foolish things of the world to confound the wise. I digress. Yehawah, and Yeshua the Lord of us be praised. <!-- s:| --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/neutral.gif" alt=":|" title="Neutral" /><!-- s:| -->
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-10-2012, 03:52 PM
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-11-2012, 10:42 PM
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-12-2012, 01:29 PM
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-13-2012, 09:55 PM
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-14-2012, 07:31 PM
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-15-2012, 07:23 AM
Re: A Freakishly Simple Primacy Proof - by Zardak - 01-16-2012, 01:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)