Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who here has the courage to reject the Pericope Adulterae?
#50
Paul Younan Wrote:...canonicity is something that, to our tradition, is strictly defined: it must have been written by one of the Apostles, or their immediate successors.

Akhi, you have perked my curiosity but since we don't yet know each other well I should give some disclaimers. Please don't take my questions as mean hole-poking; I just like things to make cohesive sense to me and I gravitate to apparent inconsistencies so to have them clarified or repaired. Also, I'm not a big fan of Dave here so far, so I'm not trying to score points for him.

All that said however, I must humbly ask: In your view, how does Luqa fit into your above canonicity algorithm? Are Luqa's books acceptable because of the tradition that Luqa wrote for Shaul/Paulus, or is there some other extenuating rule? I ask because I am not aware of Luqa being either Shlikha(sp?) or successor to one.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 02-24-2011, 06:11 PM
Re: Who here has the courage to reject the Pericope Adultera - by rramlow - 03-09-2011, 05:31 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)