Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who here has the courage to reject the Pericope Adulterae?
#37
Dear Distazo,

distazo Wrote:G.D. Bauscher WROTE John 8 using DSS (script) and the obvious mistake for skipping that part of John is evident. G.D. Bauscher, while he is an Aramaic Primacist, is the only one who was open enough to think outside of the (church) box!

Which basically means that the NT Rev. Bauscher created, exists nowhere in the textual history. It is a creation in his own image. It is not authentic. It is how he feels the NT should be reconstructed, no doubt with guidance directly from the Holy Spirit. Which is fine, I guess, if you're ok with that.

Rev. Bauscher picks and chooses his beliefs as he picks and chooses what he considers scriptural, even to the point of reconstructing his own perfect Aramaic New Testament that exists nowhere in history. It is an attempt to squeeze an Aramaic peg through a Greek hole.

I prefer to stick with the evidence, defensible evidence...textual, archaeological and patristic.

+Shamasha
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 02-24-2011, 06:11 PM
Re: Who here has the courage to reject the Pericope Adultera - by Paul Younan - 03-06-2011, 02:42 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)