Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Philoxian vs harklean Revelation
#9
Hello Stephen,
I do disagree with Dave Bauscher on certain things. But I do feel that he is right when it comes to Revelation. This is because of the Aramaic poetry and other interesting things in Revelation.

I believe Revelation was written in Aramaic, because of several reasons.

Let me give some outside reasons. Apollonius of Tyana was a Greek philosopher who lived during the time of Nero. He calls Nero a "Beast." He says like this about Nero - "In my travels, which have been wider than ever man yet accomplished, I have seen man, many wild beasts of Arabia and India; but this beast, that is commonly called a Tyrant, I know not how many heads it has, nor if it be crooked of claw, and armed with horrible fangs. ... And of wild beasts you cannot say that they were ever known to eat their own mother, but Nero has gorged himself on this diet."

Also More about Nero and 666 can be seen in this link.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beast_(preterism">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beast_(preterism</a><!-- m -->)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by distazo - 12-28-2010, 07:37 AM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by distazo - 12-28-2010, 09:48 PM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by distazo - 12-29-2010, 07:25 AM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by konway87 - 12-29-2010, 03:49 PM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by distazo - 01-05-2011, 11:32 PM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by distazo - 01-06-2011, 12:46 PM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by ograabe - 01-06-2011, 09:19 PM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by distazo - 01-07-2011, 01:02 PM
Re: Philoxian vs harklean Revelation - by Andrej - 01-07-2011, 02:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)