Philoxian vs harklean Revelation

[Stephen Silver]

That's true, it is not sure,

however, the crawford manuscript breaths an original breath.

Too many samples here to mention.

For instance, Bible critics say that the Greek Revelation 20:5 has an non-original 'thousand years' addition.

It happens to be, this 'adding' is not in the Crawford manuscript.

Again, did anybody but G.D. Bauscher really a comparitive study?

Shlama distazo:
Yes, John Gwynn wrote a book comparing both the Philoxinian and the Harklean and from his research determined that the Crawford Codex is indeed the Philoxinian Version from which the Harklean Recension was copied to conform with the existing Greek manuscripts at the time.

Shlama,
Stephen Silver
Dukhrana Biblical Research
<!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com">www.dukhrana.com</a><!-- w -->