Philoxian vs harklean Revelation

[distazo]

Shlama:
Let's be clear. The only books that that Peter passed on to Mar Thoma in Babylon were the 22 book Eastern Aramaic Peshitta. The W-5 didn't appear to the ACoE till the Middle Ages. Sorry if I did not make that clear enough for you.

I have a copy of the Crawford manuscript in its entirety on microfilm. Yes it is beautiful but it is Western.

Stephen Silver

Stephen, thank you for making this certain.

However, I?m not like others in this thread, questioning preterism, futurism, or doctrine, but I?m saying:

Could it be that the crawford revelation is not translated from Greek? Could it belong to an authentic Jewish-Aramaic root?

Take for instance Revelation 20:5. This is the same as the Sinaiticus, however, the Crawford rev. is _not_ just a translation of the Sinaiticus.

Or is it?

Did somebody do a textual vers by verse comparison?