Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
0
My apologies about the grammar. It was lacking attention on my part.
Broad-Ley
Should've read the AENT as published by Andrew G. Roth. Maybe a little editing before sending and clarification for better understanding .
Again, I have recently purchased this Aramaic New Testament (AENT) from Andrew G. Roth. My query should more accurately posted as "are there other translations or renderings closer to the Apostles, Prophets, Messengers as they wrote and shared the message from Elohim and His Son.
Hopefully you can better understand now. Shabbat Shalom.
Posts: 281
Threads: 27
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
0
Unfortunately, I don't have Andrew Roth's AENT Bible. But I completely trust him. If you want to compare Andrew Roth's AENT to other translation, I suggest Paul Younan's Interlinear Translation.
Laurence L. Sheets and me did English portions of Paul Younan's Interlinear Translation of St. Matthew's Gospel. I am currently working on English Portions of Mark.
Here is the link to English Portions of St. Matthew's Gospel.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://rapidshare.com/files/430045764/Gospel_of_Mattai.zip">http://rapidshare.com/files/430045764/G ... Mattai.zip</a><!-- m -->
When you go into this website, you can click on Slow Download.
Posts: 281
Threads: 27
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
0
I also recommend you these websites if you are looking for more Aramaic texts.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/">http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/</a><!-- m -->
This website has Lamsa's version, Etheridge Translation and Murdock Translation.
Lamsa's version is good. But not great. He lets his beliefs affect his translations in places. Etheridge and Murdock Translations are good. But they weren't aramaic primacists. So some of the mistranslations ended up in their versions.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com/crawford/">http://www.dukhrana.com/crawford/</a><!-- m -->
This website (on the top) has Crawford Codex (2nd Peter, 2nd John, 3rd John, Jude, and Revelation). I think Crawford Codex was written around 11th or 12th century. But they do have some qualities of the Original Aramaic manuscript.
Posts: 281
Threads: 27
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
0
Unfortunately, I don't know the answer to the question.
But I think Peshitta Tanakh (Old Testament in Aramaic) is the best existing text. Lamsa did a translation on Peshitta Tanakh. According to Andrew Roth, it is a very good translation. Its far superior to Lamsa's New Testament translation.