06-10-2011, 10:56 PM
Shlama Akhi Jerry,
We don't base grammar on irregular forms. There's actually nothing unusual about the plural for "lords". But that is outside of the scope of the Emphatic for the lexical stem of M_R_A.
A comparative root to MRA is BRA (son)
The lexical stem for "the throne" is "Kuwrsyau" as well. The base lexical stem is identical to the emphatic. I don't see your point ?
No they don't. The root stem for "lord" is M_R_A, not "MARYA". The root stem for "throne" is KWRSYA. It already has the Yodh. I'm not sure what you're talking about ?
I don't follow. I really don't. We're talking about two different things, apparently.
+Shamasha
Jerry Wrote:MR` has an unusual plural absolute in the form of (Mau-Ra-WauN) "lords". The only similar pl abs structure I have found to that is (KuwR-Sa-WauN) "thrones". Even though KRS has an extra consonant to MR, the similarity is there. In other words, I am looking for a comparative root to MR`.
We don't base grammar on irregular forms. There's actually nothing unusual about the plural for "lords". But that is outside of the scope of the Emphatic for the lexical stem of M_R_A.
A comparative root to MRA is BRA (son)
Jerry Wrote:(Mau-Ra-WauN) (KuwR-Sa-WauN) plural absolute
The singular emphatic for "the-throne" is (KuwRS-Yau`)
The lexical stem for "the throne" is "Kuwrsyau" as well. The base lexical stem is identical to the emphatic. I don't see your point ?
Jerry Wrote:(MauR-Yau`) and (KuwRS-Yau`) share the same similarity in the singular emphatic.
No they don't. The root stem for "lord" is M_R_A, not "MARYA". The root stem for "throne" is KWRSYA. It already has the Yodh. I'm not sure what you're talking about ?
Jerry Wrote:Beyond that, the roots diverge some, MR` dropping the Yod and KRS carrying it forward, but I think it interesting none-the-less.
I don't follow. I really don't. We're talking about two different things, apparently.
+Shamasha