06-08-2011, 09:15 PM
Jerry, the corrected grammar (absolute vs. emphatic) is below for your reference:
(mar, m-r) - "lord" (absolute)
(mara, m-r-a) - "the-lord" (emphatic)
Reference the following verses for examples of the Emphatic case of Mar (without the Yodh)
Mattai 9:38, 11:25, 13:52, 20:1, 20:11, 20:8, 21:33, 24:43
Marqus 12:9
Luqa 7:41, 10:2, 10:21, 12:39, 13:25, 14:21, 14:23, 20:13, 20:15
Acts 14:12, 17:24,
Galatians 4:1
Colossians 4:1
The absolute is MAR (m-r), the emphatic is MARA (m-r-a) as in the above examples. You'll see it used as a construct in Mattai 9:38 (Mara Khasda), as well as an Emphatic in Mattai 11:25 (Mara de Shmaya).
Marya is not the Emphatic state of Mar. You will find no other example where a Yudh is used as the third radical when constructing the emphatic.
+Shamasha
(mar, m-r) - "lord" (absolute)
(mara, m-r-a) - "the-lord" (emphatic)
Reference the following verses for examples of the Emphatic case of Mar (without the Yodh)
Mattai 9:38, 11:25, 13:52, 20:1, 20:11, 20:8, 21:33, 24:43
Marqus 12:9
Luqa 7:41, 10:2, 10:21, 12:39, 13:25, 14:21, 14:23, 20:13, 20:15
Acts 14:12, 17:24,
Galatians 4:1
Colossians 4:1
The absolute is MAR (m-r), the emphatic is MARA (m-r-a) as in the above examples. You'll see it used as a construct in Mattai 9:38 (Mara Khasda), as well as an Emphatic in Mattai 11:25 (Mara de Shmaya).
Marya is not the Emphatic state of Mar. You will find no other example where a Yudh is used as the third radical when constructing the emphatic.
+Shamasha