06-08-2011, 08:53 PM
Shlama Jerry.
There is no grammatical rule in Aramaic that would modify the root while constructing the lexeme, to include a Yodh as the third radical when making the emphatic. That rule doesn't exist in any other example. That's where the theory is wrong.
+Shamasha
There is no grammatical rule in Aramaic that would modify the root while constructing the lexeme, to include a Yodh as the third radical when making the emphatic. That rule doesn't exist in any other example. That's where the theory is wrong.
+Shamasha