11-29-2010, 03:38 AM
soneroboricua Wrote:Yeah, unfortunately I'm not apt to accept doctrines and catechisms of the rcc... that's just something I have never been able to do, however you seem capable of swallowing EVERY doctrine that passes your way... I just stick to the scriptures, not doctrines that came 451 years later...
justalex
Rafa summed this up quite nicely:
"If you don't go by what anybody else except your own understanding teaches what are you doing here wasting your time reading the scribal work of the church which preserved the vowel pointers with the correct meaning of the text ? I ask you...are you sure it's the Holy Spirit guiding your interpretation of what the scriptures say?"
Hmmm couldn't have said it any better myself, I do believe that the ACOE does not accept all the doctrines/catechisms of the rcc as well Alex(justice), getting edgy are we? Perhaps you should back away from your keyboard and make yourself a nice hot cup of tea and just relax. <!-- s:biggrin: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/biggrin.gif" alt=":biggrin:" title="Big Grin" /><!-- s:biggrin: -->
Shlama wBurkate[/quote]
LOL... Really.. I suppose you just selectively read, wait, I know you just selectively read, so why ask. Why would I be edgy Sonero Boricua? You have yet to answer my question, all you do is parrot what someone else has said... do you even have a thought of your own?
So again... I don't follow rcc doctrines (of which that of Chalcedon 451 is one) research before you speak. I don't need tea, however a scriptural answer would do nicely, do you have one?
justalex